Betting Against Humanity

 



Whether you like it or not, they have you firmly in their crosshairs.

 "They" are the fossil energy giants and they're planning to unleash "scores of 'carbon bomb' oil and gas projects that would drive the climate past internationally agreed temperature limits with catastrophic global impacts."

...data shows these firms are in effect placing multibillion-dollar bets against humanity halting global heating. Their huge investments in new fossil fuel production could pay off only if countries fail to rapidly slash carbon emissions, which scientists say is vital.

The lure of colossal payouts in the years to come appears to be irresistible to the oil companies, despite the world’s climate scientists stating in February that further delay in cutting fossil fuel use would mean missing our last chance “to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all”.

Experts have been warning since at least 2011 that most of the world’s fossil fuel reserves could not be burned without causing catastrophic global heating.

In 2015, a high-profile analysis found that to limit global temperature below 2C, half of known oil reserves and a third of gas had to stay in the ground, along with 80% of coal.

...In April, shocked by the latest IPCC report that said it was “now or never” to start slashing emissions, [UN Secretary General Antonio] Guterres launched an outspoken attack on companies and governments whose climate actions did not match their words.

“Simply put, they are lying, and the results will be catastrophic,” he said. “Investing in new fossil fuels infrastructure is moral and economic madness.

“Climate activists are sometimes depicted as dangerous radicals. But the truly dangerous radicals are the countries that are increasing the production of fossil fuels.”

Flogging a dead horse, I have to ask you whether you will stand for this.

Flashback to November, 2015, the Paris climate summit. We had a new prime minister, the Luddite had been sent packing.  The new guy took the floor to proclaim "Canada's back." The community of nations clasped hands and pledged to limit global warming to not more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, a target that offered an even chance of averting cataclysmic, runaway global warming.  Heady days.

In attendance was the esteemed head of the Potsdam climate institute, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber.  A reporter cornered him to ask if the 1.5 C target was realistic. Was it pie in the sky?

Schellenhuber said it was possible on one condition. It would require the petro-states to dismantle the fossil energy giants. He used the term "an induced implosion." Only governments, acting in concert, had the power to end the fossil fuel economy.  Humanity's future was in our leaders' hands.

Now, six years later, instead of imploding the fossil energy industry, our leaders are promoting, enabling its expansion. They pretend that they can still save humanity. They can still arrest global warming. The can avert climate catastrophe. Words.

Instead of staunching the deluge of hydrocarbons, our leaders stand mute as the industry tosses carbon bombs at humanity. They even build new pipelines to expand the export of a particularly dirty fossil fuel, bitumen, ignoring science that warns it must be left in the ground. At the same time they open the Atlantic seabed for ever more drilling, perhaps another million barrels a day.  Deeds.

When deeds so blatantly contradict words, the words are lies. Promises are broken. Trust is destroyed. And this on the most existential threat to humanity in the history of our civilization.


Comment Response

Until I can get this Blogger glitch sorted out, I will respond to  comments at the end of the post. It's far from perfect but it's the best temporary fix I can think of.

John B. - I've been thinking of posting something about Canada's Great Migration to the Right.  The Conservatives are morphing into trailer trash Republicans. Liberals how serve as Conservative Lites. The NDP, in their tragic quest for power, have re-imagined themselves as Latter Day Liberals. The Left, as we've known it for so many decades, now stands abandoned.

Harper's overarching goal was to move Canada's political centre well and permanently to the Right. I think he succeeded as the Liberals and the NDP fell into line.




 

Comments

  1. John B.May 11, 2022 at 6:45 PM

    "Canada's back." "Sunny ways" as well. He was less dangerous when he was totally oblivious and somewhat less obnoxious.. He's just one guy and he's no different than many others, but he's the one who asked for the job.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

Image
  The Amazon rainforest is disappearing at what should be an alarming rate. 312 sq. mi. or 808 sq. kms. every day. Over the past 30 years humans have destroyed a patch of the Amazon equal in area to the states of Texas and New Mexico . The Amazon – historically a great carbon absorber, since trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen – now releases more carbon than it stores, which adds to, rather helps to reduce, our global climate crisis. Deforestation rates decreased slightly from 2004 to 2012. But since then, they’re back on the rise, especially in the past couple of years, since Jair Bolsonaro became president of Brazil. In 2018, as Bolsonaro campaigned as a patriotic man of the people, scientists predicted that once the Amazon lost more than 25% of its tree cover, it would become a drier ecosystem, all because deforestation changes weather patterns (due to how trees respire), which in turn reduces rainfall. Furthermore, as the forest becomes fragmented, areas surrounded...
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr...
Read more

Who Asks "Why?"

Every time there's a conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, all we hear is 'why?'  Why, as in, whose fault is this? It's easier to affix blame if you can truncate the event. Pick a convenient start date, something recent. In this case we'll make it either the Israeli eviction of Arabs from Jerusalem or the scuffle that took place outside the mosque in response. If those don't work, let's go for Hamas launching unguided rockets into Israel. That's even better because it tags Hamas with the blame. The nice thing about this approach is you can just keep using it. It goes on and on, just as it has for the past half-century since the '67 war. You can even date this whole mess to the beginning of the occupation of the Palestinian territories. The Israelis are said to have called these periodic wars, "mowing the lawn." The idea is that, every now and then, you have to take these Arabs to the woodshed. And then you keep your powder dry unt...
Read more