Sound Familiar? The Dirty Marriage of Politics and Oil.


 

There's no way out of this unless we break the fossil fuelers grip on our politicians.

The fossil fuel industry and its influence over policy was the major elephant in the room looming over the release of the third and final report, out this week, from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading climate authority. The major source of contention: how do you talk about mitigating climate change without confronting the fossil fuel industry? “It’s like Star Wars without Darth Vader,” says environmental sociologist Robert Brulle, of Brown University.

The report made one thing abundantly clear: the technologies and policies necessary to adequately address climate change exist, and the only real obstacles are politics and fossil fuel interests.

...Unlike the research-heavy chapters, which are controlled entirely by the scientists who research and write them, the Summary for Policymakers must be approved by government representatives from 195 countries around the world; the approval process for this year’s mitigation report was the longest and most contentious in the history of the IPCC. According to leaked reports, representatives from Saudi Arabia in particular argued for multiple references to carbon capture and storage and the watering down of language on shutting down fossil fuel production.

...Despite the influence of oil companies and oil-rich nations, the report does still highlight the fossil fuel industry’s influence on policymaking, and eviscerates some of the industry’s favorite myths. In the new chapter on “Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation”, for example, researchers challenged the long-held belief that fossil fuel consumption is entirely driven by demand. “What we were able to demonstrate was actually the contrary: there is no sustainable development or development, full stop, possible without climate mitigation,” said Steinberger, who was a contributing author on the chapter.

“Unless you mitigate climate, the impacts are going to catch you every step of the way and just make people’s lives increasingly hard and miserable, especially in the global south.”

I've been called a "Trudeau hater" for pointing out that our federal government is Big Oil's lap dog. Sorry but Mr. Trudeau's 21 billion dollar (and counting) pipeline, intended for the sole purpose of flooding world markets with one of the dirtiest, high carbon, low value fossil fuels speaks volumes. 

See also, "The world is on fire. Why is Canada considering massive new oil drilling?"

Comments

  1. Palast has done many articles on big oil, this is the latest

    https://www.gregpalast.com/steven-donziger-a-corporate-criminal-prosecution-orchestrated-by-chevron/


    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the heads up, TB. It's been years since I followed Palast. Great journo.

      Delete
  2. Independent journalists are having a rough time nowadays.
    They have had their wings clipped within the MSM so have turned to 'suspect' media such as Sputnik and RT who readily promote their , rightfully , condemnation of some western decisions whilst hiding their own bias.
    Chris Hedges had his thoughts ! erased from the internet due to his affiliation with RT.
    I do not always agree with Hedges, far from it , but he does offer a readable point of discussion.
    Today's political events particularly in the Ukraine are opening up a Pandora box of competitive and combative views of the world that defies the real issues of the day.

    Perhaps the free! vote of democracy is incapable of solving the worlds issues?

    TB

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

Who Asks "Why?"