I Watched a Movie this Weekend. Wish I Hadn't.


 

I don't know a lot of climate scientists but there are a few with whom I maintain an occassional correspondence. There's a fellow from Japan who is analyzing how the loss of glaciers and ice sheets may trigger tectonic events as the weight of that ice is converted to water that runs off into the sea. Interesting stuff but I haven't packed my bags yet.

Then there's a fellow at the University of Hawaii who runs his own climate lab that is unlocking the sometimes overlooked information by churning through mountains of research data.

Here's an excerpt of an email I recently sent.  

I live on Vancouver Island just off the west coast of the Canadian mainland. We see a wide range of climate impacts from premature melting of snowpacks, waters that are vital to salmon spawning in late spring and summer; to the migration of marine life out of the south including the arrival of hundreds of great whales, transient orca, large pods of dolphins, an abundance of seals and sea lions, even brown pelicans.

Ours has been a pleasantly moderate climate, mild summers and winters. Last summer we were shocked by the arrival of "heat domes." Even one block from the waters of the north Pacific we reached 39 degrees Celsius. A few hundred miles inland, the small mountain town of Lytton set all time Canadian temperature records on three consecutive days, finally reaching 49.6 Celsius. On the fourth day the town was erased by fire. Much of British Columbia was blanketed by wildfire smoke with high levels of Pm 2.5 particulates. As summer turned to autumn we were hit by atmospheric rivers and flash flooding that severed every highway and rail line connecting British Columbia to the rest of Canada. Then, as Christmas arrived, the coast was hit by heavy snows that lasted almost two weeks. We seem to have become a Petri dish for climate change.

Now, in the midst of northern hemisphere winter, heat waves are ravaging Australia and South America.

How do we make sense of these changes?

My acquaintance replied that to grasp the nature of our predicament I should watch the movie, "Don't Look Up." I had avoided the movie, not a big fan of Leo DiCaprio. Yet watch it I finally did. Here's the story line from Rotten Tomatoes:

Kate Dibiasky (Jennifer Lawrence), an astronomy grad student, and her professor Dr. Randall Mindy (Leonardo DiCaprio) make an astounding discovery of a comet orbiting within the solar system. The problem: it's on a direct collision course with Earth. The other problem? No one really seems to care. Turns out warning mankind about a planet-killer the size of Mount Everest is an inconvenient fact to navigate. With the help of Dr. Oglethorpe (Rob Morgan), Kate and Randall embark on a media tour that takes them from the office of an indifferent President Orlean (Meryl Streep) and her sycophantic son and Chief of Staff, Jason (Jonah Hill), to the airwaves of The Daily Rip, an upbeat morning show hosted by Brie (Cate Blanchett) and Jack (Tyler Perry). With only six months until the comet makes impact, managing the 24-hour news cycle and gaining the attention of the social media obsessed public before it's too late proves shockingly comical -- what will it take to get the world to just look up?!

Spoiler alert - life on earth is wiped out.

Don't Look Up was largely panned by critics. I can understand that. However DLU seems to have traction where it matters, with climate scientists. To some it's an overdone parody. To those immersed in climate science there's nothing funny about it.

It's an all star cast. I particularly liked Mark Rylance as a Steve Jobs character who manipulates the president (Streep) to try to capture the asteroid for its precious minerals.


Comments

  1. Glad to hear you watched 'Don't Look Up' Mound. Fiction has its uses!

    "The Day After Tomorrow" with its semi-happy-ending is the good case scenario. (Don't get hung up on the fictional devices that warp/speed-up climate change for plot reasons.)
    Perhaps it represented a more optimistic time, way back in 2004 when some of us still had some hope on the climate front.

    "Don't look up" and it's much darker message, is emblematic of this time when greenwashing gov'ts wear climate-hair-shirts and simultaneously approve and fund new fossil fuel projects.

    Hey, "Mark Rylance as a Steve Jobs" works but I saw him as a Musk/Bezos combo character. And as for "Don't Look Up was largely panned by critics". I'd say it was better than most of the streaming crap that I've abandoned after 5 minutes of agony.

    And there is a venerable tradition that Adam McKay was following here:
    "The Sheep Look Up is a science fiction novel by British author John Brunner, first published in 1972. The novel is decidedly dystopian; the book deals with the deterioration of the environment in the United States. It was nominated for the Nebula Award for Best Novel in 1972."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NPoV, I left a reply to your comment but Blogger ate it.

      "when greenwashing gov'ts wear climate-hair-shirts and simultaneously approve and fund new fossil fuel projects" - do you have anyone in mind?

      I don't think we have the political leadership or, for that matter, the public interest in tackling our first existential threat.

      In mid-February I did a post on this year's Munich Security Conference and its theme, "collective helplessness."

      "The report describes a mood of 'collective helplessness.' In the same way as ordinary individuals, whole societies can be overcome by a sense that they simply have no answer to the challenges they face."

      We don't look up. We are in the grip of collective helplessness.

      Churchill said that sometimes it is not enough that we do our best. Sometimes we must do what is required. In that lies the key to survival. We will have none of it.

      Delete
    2. Yes. on my mind I had the most recent Bay du Nord insult/approval by some guy who is supposed to be a famous environmentalist - i don't bother remembering names like his anymore - The Cons said he would green out all their favourite fossil-fuels projects, ya right ...
      and the $ in the budget for CCS carbon capture and storage technology? pissing in the wind comes to mind.

      "And there ain't nothin' like a friend
      Who can tell you you're just pissin' in the wind

      I never knew a man could tell so many lies
      He had a different story for every set of eyes
      How can he remember who he's talking to?
      'Cause I know it ain't me, and hope it isn't you" N Young

      Delete
  2. Sometimes, fiction is very prescient, Mound. Some of us might not sleep well after viewing this look into the future..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish this left people sleepless, Owen. The fellow who urged me to watch this movie seemed stymied by the masses in denial, the political caste who drag their heels while promising action and the indifferent mass media.

      Delete
  3. I enjoyed the movie, Mound, especially the way it represents the inertia the Di Caprio character is met with when he makes it clear that the earth will be destroyed if action is not taken. Too obvious a message? Clearly, not for a lot of people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can't say I enjoyed it, Lorne. More deeply saddened than anything. In the 15+ years I've had this blog I have watched so many dire studies, one layered atop another, only to disappear down the memory hole before the week is out. We've come to the point where some of the lead contributors to the IPCC see in the inaction after 26 climate summits little point in hoping we'll do better next time or the next dozen summits.

    There's still little sense of urgency even as time is fast running out on meaningful action.

    ReplyDelete

  5. https://thespool.net/features/the-day-after-tomorrow-and-disaster-flicks-as-political-polemic/

    TB

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://youtu.be/O6T-iwy0bOU

    Real life parodies fiction. The film tried to be as satirical as possible but real life still surpasses it.

    I'm positioned now where I can observe how these oil/coal/energy companies act on the daily, and it's fairly miserable work trying to keep on top of them. They're shady and slippery. They lavish dollars around everywhere buying if not loyalty than at least non-opposition. The only thing we've got in opposition is commitment, and that's a hard thing to keep employed when people got bills to pay. And bills are rising higher and higher and these sorts of times are hard times to stay in opposition.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating the Minefield of Short-Termism

The Gun We Point at Our Own Heads

The Cognoscenti Syndrome