Are We Being Set Up? Your Insurer May Be Playing You For a Sucker.

 

Munich Re, Swiss Re, Hanover Ruck - these outfits know a thing or two about risks and usually give you the straight goods. They're the giants that retail insurers rely upon to offload some of their policy obligations.

The problem is that you don't get to deal with the reinsurers.  You have to deal with the retail-grade outfits to insure your house, your life, your car, even your holiday abroad. And they're not in the business of telling you the truth.

At one time we imagined that the insurance industry would be our climate heroes. Turns out they had other ideas.

The retail side of the industry continued to provide coverage for home and businesses at risk from climate-related fires and wind storms. Indeed, since the climate risks surfaced, millions of people have moved into wildfire zones in the US west and to coastal properties at risk of hurricanes, storm surges and sea level rise. That influx of people continues, even though the Florida coast has eight of the 20 cities in the US most threatened by sea level rise.

Insurers continued to ignore the threat of climate change in part because the incentives at the retail end are to continue to write policies right up until catastrophe strikes and because the reinsurance end has shown extraordinary ingenuity in limiting, spreading and offloading risks. For one thing, most policies have to be renewed every year, which gives insurers the option to either raise prices or pull out of an area entirely should disaster strike. For another, after Hurricane Andrew in August 1992, insurers offloaded some of the risks through the innovation of so-called catastrophe bonds, which offer outside investors high rates insuring a specific risk for a specified period of time.

The ultra-wealthy can self-insure, but most middle-class homeowners or homebuyers cannot get a mortgage in a zone vulnerable to wildfires or other natural disasters without insurance protection. And if private insurers raise rates or pull out, do taxpayers want to assume responsibility for trillions of dollars of damages from climate risks to protect people who choose to live in harm’s way? The mispricing of climate risk has set the stage for a property and banking crisis that could dwarf what happened in 2008 and, unlike that meltdown, the weather extremes that caused the crash would only intensify in subsequent years.


Comments

  1. Northern PoVMarch 30, 2022 at 6:36 AM

    This is from the Guardian and, imo, nicely bookends the item above.

    When disaster looms, change the definition of disaster:

    "Met Office to increase heatwave thresholds across parts of England
    Thresholds being raised in eight counties as average temperatures rise due to global heating"

    Nothing to see here, move along and society doesn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibMarch 30, 2022 at 2:08 PM

      The Scandinavians are imagining themselves as the new Mediterranean resort destination as southern Europe becomes a parched wasteland while the Baltic warms. Stranger things...

      Delete
  2. Owen GrayMarch 30, 2022 at 8:53 AM

    The key to success these days, Mound, lies in the ability of the wealthy to spot and hose the suckers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibMarch 30, 2022 at 2:12 PM

      A few years ago I read an analysis piece that concluded the ultra rich had decided that they didn't want to buy off governments but to own them outright. Stiglitz and others have shown that today's hyper-inequality is neither market nor merit-based. It is legislated.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

Image
  The Amazon rainforest is disappearing at what should be an alarming rate. 312 sq. mi. or 808 sq. kms. every day. Over the past 30 years humans have destroyed a patch of the Amazon equal in area to the states of Texas and New Mexico . The Amazon – historically a great carbon absorber, since trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen – now releases more carbon than it stores, which adds to, rather helps to reduce, our global climate crisis. Deforestation rates decreased slightly from 2004 to 2012. But since then, they’re back on the rise, especially in the past couple of years, since Jair Bolsonaro became president of Brazil. In 2018, as Bolsonaro campaigned as a patriotic man of the people, scientists predicted that once the Amazon lost more than 25% of its tree cover, it would become a drier ecosystem, all because deforestation changes weather patterns (due to how trees respire), which in turn reduces rainfall. Furthermore, as the forest becomes fragmented, areas surrounded...
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr...
Read more

Who Asks "Why?"

Every time there's a conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, all we hear is 'why?'  Why, as in, whose fault is this? It's easier to affix blame if you can truncate the event. Pick a convenient start date, something recent. In this case we'll make it either the Israeli eviction of Arabs from Jerusalem or the scuffle that took place outside the mosque in response. If those don't work, let's go for Hamas launching unguided rockets into Israel. That's even better because it tags Hamas with the blame. The nice thing about this approach is you can just keep using it. It goes on and on, just as it has for the past half-century since the '67 war. You can even date this whole mess to the beginning of the occupation of the Palestinian territories. The Israelis are said to have called these periodic wars, "mowing the lawn." The idea is that, every now and then, you have to take these Arabs to the woodshed. And then you keep your powder dry unt...
Read more