What Two Millennia of Chinese Dynasties

 


Wars, revolutions and assassinations can trigger regime change but climate events destroy societies.

A paper, published in the journal Nature, traced major volcanic events over two millennia that had global impacts. The timing matched major upheavals from ancient Egypt to dynastic China.


What stunned [Joseph Manning, a Yale Egyptologist], was that the paper recalibrated earlier chronologies by seven to eight years, so that dates of the eruptions neatly coincided with the timing of well-documented political, social, and military upheavals over three centuries of ancient Egyptian history. The paper also correlated volcanic eruptions with major 6th century A.D. pandemics, famines, and socioeconomic turmoil in Europe, Asia, and Central America. The inescapable conclusion, the paper argued, was that volcanic soot — which cools the earth by shielding its surface from sunlight, adversely affecting growing seasons and causing crop failures — helped drive those crises.

Since then, other scholarly papers relying on paleoclimatic data— most of it drawing on state-of-the-art technologies originally designed to understand climate change — have found innumerable instances when shifts in climate helped trigger social and political tumult and, often, collapses. The latest is a paper⁠ published last month⁠ in Communications Earth and Environment that posited “a systematic association between volcanic eruptions and dynastic collapse across two millennia of Chinese history.”

The study found that 62 of 68 dynastic collapses⁠ occurred soon after Northern Hemisphere volcanic eruptions, an outcome that had only a one-in-2,000 chance of happening if the eruptions and collapses were unrelated. Chinese have traditionally cited the withdrawal of the “mandate of heaven” to explain the cold weather, droughts, floods, and agricultural failures that seemed to accompany the fall of dynasties. The paper contends that those phenomena have a climatic explanation.

All these papers are propelled by a nearly-decade-long revolution in climate science technology. A blizzard of quantitative data from “climate proxies” — ice cores, tree rings, cave stalagmites and stalactites, and lake, bog, and seabed sediments — has upended the way some historians do their work.

...To tap that data, some historians are crossing extensive barriers within their discipline to work with biologists, geologists, geographers, paleoclimatologists, climate modelers, anthropologists, and others. These mold-breaking historians are learning geochemistry and climatology; the scientists they work with are reading history.

Manning now attends more science conferences than history conferences. A paper⁠ he co-authored last year with 19 other natural scientists, historians, and archeologists argued that one of the biggest volcanic eruptions of the last 2,500 years, at Alaska’s Okmok volcano in 43 B.C., resulted in a decade of forbiddingly cold temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere, helped trigger the end of Egypt’s Ptolemaic Kingdom, and hastened the transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire, as Rome gave up some trappings of constitutional government to become an absolute monarchy. As the paper explained, “The wet and very cold conditions from this massive eruption on the opposite side of Earth probably resulted in crop failures, famine, and disease, exacerbating social unrest and contributing to political realignments across the Mediterranean region at this critical juncture of Western civilization.”


Comments

  1. An excellent find, Mound. The ultimate climate 'black swan'.

    And just the other day I became aware of Antarctic methane release and

    "Antarctica has 138 known volcanoes: 91 of these were discovered only in 2017 "

    "The scientists say their findings reveal a previously unknown source of methane emissions that could further disrupt the global climate system. “Both Iceland and Antarctica have many ice-covered, active volcanoes and geothermal systems”"

    Yikes

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just had a quick scan of some articles on Antarctic methane, NPoV. It does sound awfully serious. What can we learn from this that's useful for the future or do we still want to learn anything we don't want to hear?

    The early narrative on climate change (i.e. 30 years ago) argued that we had to arrest global heating or risk triggering natural GHG emissions, feedback loops, resulting in runaway heating. That's more relevant than ever but the argument itself has been largely purged from our conversation. We apply political solutions to scientific issues - carbon taxes - and, quite predictably, we're still falling behind because we have crossed tipping points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can we influence volcanic activity in Antarctica? Fracking? Glacier melt/weight-shift changing crust dynamics? Beyond my pay grade. ;-)

      But here is one we can for sure change if we had the civic rigor:
      "A satellite finds massive methane leaks from gas pipelines "

      We should be talking 'methane capture' (we have all the tech already) not experimental carbon capture at this stage. (Capitalism prevents this imo.)

      https://www.npr.org/2022/02/03/1077392791/a-satellite-finds-massive-methane-leaks-from-gas-pipelines?utm_campaign=storyshare&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social

      Delete
    2. I had a brief correspondence a few years ago with a Japanese climate scientist whose research found that a loss of glaciers and ice caps will indeed destabilize the Ring of Fire.

      The satellite data on methane is intended to assist governments to crack down on leaky drilling wells and pipelines. Will they act?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating the Minefield of Short-Termism

The Gun We Point at Our Own Heads

The Cognoscenti Syndrome