Our Oceans Passed a Critical Tipping Point in 2014
Eight years ago the oceans entered a state of extreme heat and there's no going back.
Extreme heat in the world’s oceans passed the “point of no return” in 2014 and has become the new normal, according to research.
Scientists analysed sea surface temperatures over the last 150 years, which have risen because of global heating. They found that extreme temperatures occurring just 2% of the time a century ago have occurred at least 50% of the time across the global ocean since 2014.
In some hotspots, extreme temperatures occur 90% of the time, severely affecting wildlife. More than 90% of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases is absorbed by the ocean, which plays a critical role in maintaining a stable climate.
We need to realize that carbon taxes are not going to fix what ails us. The migration of once rare species into the Salish Sea is no fluke. It's not a possibility. It's a fact.
We also know that all that extra heat energy now trapped in our oceans isn't like fossil fuel energy that for millions of years was safely and permanently sequestered deep underground. That ocean heat energy can be returned to the atmosphere. The laws of conservation of energy hold that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. So, while oceans have been soaking up 90 per cent of the excess heat from global warming, it's not safely sequestered.
-------
From climate.gov: Heat absorbed by the ocean is moved from one place to another, but it doesn’t disappear. The heat energy eventually re-enters the rest of the Earth system by melting ice shelves, evaporating water, or directly reheating the atmosphere. Thus, heat energy in the ocean can warm the planet for decades after it was absorbed.
------
All the inside baseball post about Canadian politics (mea culpa for participating) look rather frivolous lined up with this one.
ReplyDeleteI hesitated before posting this, NPoV. Even self-styled "progressives" turn their heads to this sort of thing.
DeleteGovernments ignore this. Their focus, to the extent they have focus, is on GHG emissions which, in our case, they vow to fight even as they put their money in pipelines, fossil fuel subsidies, etc. Other existential threats such as the heating and acidification of the oceans are largely ignored.
We're regularly warned that AI might displace humans. I suppose that's true but it might avoid the cognitive dissonance we endure under human governance.