"Don't Call Them Protesters" - Michael Harris



Michael Harris writes that the mob that occupied Ottawa's Centretown were no more "protesters" than the mob that ransacked the Capitol on January 6th were "tourists" or "patriots." And he says the media allowed themselves to be duped, imbuing thugs with an undeserved legitimacy.


The right to protest is a vital part of democracy. Everybody believes that citizens have the right to speak up lawfully against public policies they don’t support. There are a lot of places where doing that will land you in jail or worse. Thankfully, Canada is not one of them.

But that is not what the occupiers in Ottawa were doing. You don’t have to look very far to confirm that. One of their stated goals was to topple the government. Another was to secure the resignation of Justin Trudeau, implying he was a Nazi.

Which is to say, that they did not come with a critique and a point of view, as legitimate protesters do. They came with ugly biases, lies and an ultimatum. Get rid of all the mandated restrictions related to the pandemic, and get rid of this federal government and this PM or else. Last time I looked, parliament and elected MPs make the laws, not mobs holding their fellow citizens hostage to their cause.

...These self-styled freedom-lovers were authoritarian thugs wrapped in the Canadian flag.

Who urinates on the grave of the unknown soldier to make their point?

Who expresses their love of freedom by depriving thousands of their fellow citizens of their right to get to work, or even a good night’s sleep, for weeks on end?

Who drags their kids into a situation made inherently dangerous by the actions of the parents?

Who makes their argument by displaying hate symbols and shouting down journalists trying to do their jobs?

Who has their say by jamming the local 911 system, a tactic that could easily have cost lives?

The sad part, for me, is that it's hard to argue with Harris' points.








Comments

  1. Northern PoVFebruary 21, 2022 at 9:27 AM

    Back to Berger....

    For better or worse, protest is public spectacle. It is message driven. Civil disobedience is partly about intentionally getting arrested. It is about using the state's legal actions as a stage to reach a broader audience and exhaust the state's resources. It is a classic David/Goliath play for public opinion.

    Revolutionary protest is different. It is designed to provoke an unequal crushing response that finally incites the general populace to violent revolution.

    I am pissed that the First Nations' attempts to do protest are met with the crushing violent response meant for revolutionary incidents. It intentionally confuses the issues and the public.

    These white-supremist thugs seem to have a confused the two types of protest and schadenfreude makes me want to see them 'get what they deserve' .... however ...
    By using kid-gloves over the weekend and at the borders, I must admit that the authorities won twice - on the ground and in the media.

    The thugs, the CONs and the premiers look bad while the Federal Gov't looks good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibFebruary 21, 2022 at 10:26 AM

      Even the ever-rightwing columnist, John Ibbitson, sees this as a generational setback for the trucker-coddling Conservatives.

      Delete
  2. GyorFebruary 21, 2022 at 10:56 AM

    H's right, don't call them protesters, call them what they really are, heroes fighting for civil liberties and human rights in the face of a tyrant.

    ReplyDelete
  3. lungtaFebruary 21, 2022 at 11:41 AM

    Occupiers
    Blockaders
    Foreign Influencers
    Insurrectionists
    Agitators
    Militants
    Saboteurs
    Loiters
    Mischief makers
    Potential arsonists
    Child endangerers
    Racists
    Criminals
    Political Opportunists
    Anarchists
    Narcissists
    Bullies
    People of good conscience with a genuine grievance.
    The big warm blanket of "peaceful protesters" can cover a bunch.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LorneFebruary 21, 2022 at 12:45 PM

    One of the biggest lies of the occupation, in my view, was that there were infiltrators (racists, etc.) who latched onto what was otherwise a peaceful and legitimate protest, There was nothing legitimate in the paralyzing insurrection that we witnessed in Ottawa for three weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibFebruary 21, 2022 at 3:16 PM

      In the early days of the Tea Party mob I sensed that people, ordinary people, were being groomed, manipulated by the dog whistle programming of FOX News, Linbaugh and their ilk.

      I expect the mob that descended on Ottawa was also groomed to the point they did not grasp the futility of their occupation. How did they expect it to end? What did they imagine they would achieve? This came down to an 18-wheel tantrum that could only end one way with the Canadian public squarely against them.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating the Minefield of Short-Termism

Image
Its disappearance went largely unnoticed. There was no post mortem, no eulogy, no deep sighs for what had been lost. Posterity slipped from our consciousness as we ushered in the neoliberal era 40 years ago. Populations would now be administered, not led. Grand vision was a quaint artifact of generations past. Besides, the invisible hand of the marketplace would see to all our needs today, tomorrow, forever. Politicians grew smaller and smaller until they shrunk to fit the mold of technocracy.  Like sheep being dipped we were plunged into a world of supply-side economics in which lower taxation and deregulation would deliver manna from heaven. We focused on skinning the economy, and society, right to the bone. Everything would be maximized, nothing would be wasted, not even the offal.  We were surrendered to a world of short-termism. We elected governments of technocrats - grey suits stuffed with wet cardboard - whose horizons were measured in electoral cycles. They would do what they
Read more

The Gun We Point at Our Own Heads

Image
  If you're sitting at a table and there's a loaded pistol in front of you, do you pick it up and point it at your own head?  Probably not, unless something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. How would you feel if someone else was holding that pistol to your head? But there is a pistol pointed at our heads and, unless we do something about it, we're goners. It's not a Glock. It's fossil fuels and the industry is slowly squeezing the trigger. Proven fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to generate 3.5 trillion tons of greenhouse gas emissions .  Russia and the United States each have massive reserves of fossil energy sufficient to push humanity through the 1.5C heating limit, sometimes called the "carbon budget."  I have it on reliable authority that Washington and the Kremlin aren't getting along very well these days. After all, if you won't hold the line on nuclear proliferation, you might not be inclined to voluntarily give up a major source of na
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr
Read more