"Don't Call Them Protesters" - Michael Harris



Michael Harris writes that the mob that occupied Ottawa's Centretown were no more "protesters" than the mob that ransacked the Capitol on January 6th were "tourists" or "patriots." And he says the media allowed themselves to be duped, imbuing thugs with an undeserved legitimacy.


The right to protest is a vital part of democracy. Everybody believes that citizens have the right to speak up lawfully against public policies they don’t support. There are a lot of places where doing that will land you in jail or worse. Thankfully, Canada is not one of them.

But that is not what the occupiers in Ottawa were doing. You don’t have to look very far to confirm that. One of their stated goals was to topple the government. Another was to secure the resignation of Justin Trudeau, implying he was a Nazi.

Which is to say, that they did not come with a critique and a point of view, as legitimate protesters do. They came with ugly biases, lies and an ultimatum. Get rid of all the mandated restrictions related to the pandemic, and get rid of this federal government and this PM or else. Last time I looked, parliament and elected MPs make the laws, not mobs holding their fellow citizens hostage to their cause.

...These self-styled freedom-lovers were authoritarian thugs wrapped in the Canadian flag.

Who urinates on the grave of the unknown soldier to make their point?

Who expresses their love of freedom by depriving thousands of their fellow citizens of their right to get to work, or even a good night’s sleep, for weeks on end?

Who drags their kids into a situation made inherently dangerous by the actions of the parents?

Who makes their argument by displaying hate symbols and shouting down journalists trying to do their jobs?

Who has their say by jamming the local 911 system, a tactic that could easily have cost lives?

The sad part, for me, is that it's hard to argue with Harris' points.








Comments

  1. Northern PoVFebruary 21, 2022 at 9:27 AM

    Back to Berger....

    For better or worse, protest is public spectacle. It is message driven. Civil disobedience is partly about intentionally getting arrested. It is about using the state's legal actions as a stage to reach a broader audience and exhaust the state's resources. It is a classic David/Goliath play for public opinion.

    Revolutionary protest is different. It is designed to provoke an unequal crushing response that finally incites the general populace to violent revolution.

    I am pissed that the First Nations' attempts to do protest are met with the crushing violent response meant for revolutionary incidents. It intentionally confuses the issues and the public.

    These white-supremist thugs seem to have a confused the two types of protest and schadenfreude makes me want to see them 'get what they deserve' .... however ...
    By using kid-gloves over the weekend and at the borders, I must admit that the authorities won twice - on the ground and in the media.

    The thugs, the CONs and the premiers look bad while the Federal Gov't looks good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibFebruary 21, 2022 at 10:26 AM

      Even the ever-rightwing columnist, John Ibbitson, sees this as a generational setback for the trucker-coddling Conservatives.

      Delete
  2. GyorFebruary 21, 2022 at 10:56 AM

    H's right, don't call them protesters, call them what they really are, heroes fighting for civil liberties and human rights in the face of a tyrant.

    ReplyDelete
  3. lungtaFebruary 21, 2022 at 11:41 AM

    Occupiers
    Blockaders
    Foreign Influencers
    Insurrectionists
    Agitators
    Militants
    Saboteurs
    Loiters
    Mischief makers
    Potential arsonists
    Child endangerers
    Racists
    Criminals
    Political Opportunists
    Anarchists
    Narcissists
    Bullies
    People of good conscience with a genuine grievance.
    The big warm blanket of "peaceful protesters" can cover a bunch.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LorneFebruary 21, 2022 at 12:45 PM

    One of the biggest lies of the occupation, in my view, was that there were infiltrators (racists, etc.) who latched onto what was otherwise a peaceful and legitimate protest, There was nothing legitimate in the paralyzing insurrection that we witnessed in Ottawa for three weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibFebruary 21, 2022 at 3:16 PM

      In the early days of the Tea Party mob I sensed that people, ordinary people, were being groomed, manipulated by the dog whistle programming of FOX News, Linbaugh and their ilk.

      I expect the mob that descended on Ottawa was also groomed to the point they did not grasp the futility of their occupation. How did they expect it to end? What did they imagine they would achieve? This came down to an 18-wheel tantrum that could only end one way with the Canadian public squarely against them.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

Image
  The Amazon rainforest is disappearing at what should be an alarming rate. 312 sq. mi. or 808 sq. kms. every day. Over the past 30 years humans have destroyed a patch of the Amazon equal in area to the states of Texas and New Mexico . The Amazon – historically a great carbon absorber, since trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen – now releases more carbon than it stores, which adds to, rather helps to reduce, our global climate crisis. Deforestation rates decreased slightly from 2004 to 2012. But since then, they’re back on the rise, especially in the past couple of years, since Jair Bolsonaro became president of Brazil. In 2018, as Bolsonaro campaigned as a patriotic man of the people, scientists predicted that once the Amazon lost more than 25% of its tree cover, it would become a drier ecosystem, all because deforestation changes weather patterns (due to how trees respire), which in turn reduces rainfall. Furthermore, as the forest becomes fragmented, areas surrounded...
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr...
Read more

Who Asks "Why?"

Every time there's a conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, all we hear is 'why?'  Why, as in, whose fault is this? It's easier to affix blame if you can truncate the event. Pick a convenient start date, something recent. In this case we'll make it either the Israeli eviction of Arabs from Jerusalem or the scuffle that took place outside the mosque in response. If those don't work, let's go for Hamas launching unguided rockets into Israel. That's even better because it tags Hamas with the blame. The nice thing about this approach is you can just keep using it. It goes on and on, just as it has for the past half-century since the '67 war. You can even date this whole mess to the beginning of the occupation of the Palestinian territories. The Israelis are said to have called these periodic wars, "mowing the lawn." The idea is that, every now and then, you have to take these Arabs to the woodshed. And then you keep your powder dry unt...
Read more