If They Can't Handle a Pandemic, They'll Never Tackle Our Real Problems

Two years and five waves reveal a dangerous pattern in the competence of Canada's provincial and federal governments as they struggle to balance the economy with the emergency.

At first, in the opening months of 2000, it was a "one and done" problem.  We go into lockdown, Covid takes the hint, and then we live happily ever after. We've been dancing to the vacillation of our "leaders" five times now. But, don't worry, when this fifth wave is over, we'll be fine.

This pandemic has left scars. We've drained our treasuries. We have watched our economies hobbled as the tap was repeatedly turned off then on then off.  We've discovered that our economies are not resilient, they're pretty fragile with their long and vulnerable supply chains.

What lessons have we been taught? What lessons have we learned? Not much. We're still where we were two years ago. We're still playing this by ear through a filter of wishful thinking. That's a lousy combination. We have not learned that vacillation is not an option. It doesn't work. 

Let's turn to a far more worrisome emergency, climate breakdown. That's a truly existential threat, not some body blow to the economy. It goes to the continued existence of our nations, our economies, and ourselves. It goes to the habitability of our overcrowded planet. We know we've got perhaps 20 years to fix this so what are we doing about it? We're building a pipeline. 

Climate breakdown requires one thing, just one. Mankind must learn to live in harmony with nature, our one and only biosphere. We have tried to tame nature to our wants and that hasn't worked. It has failed on so many levels - climate breakdown, the loss of biodiversity, resource exhaustion and depletion, overpopulation, crippling inequality, on and on and on. As we continue to deny the limits of our very finite biosphere these problems simply grow larger, more intractible. We're losing.

To avoid dealing with the real problems we resort to infantile solutions, magical thinking, gestural responses such as carbon taxes, stuff that might have worked in the 70s or the 80s but not today.

We struggle to defend the indefensible, the economy and perpetual exponential growth. We seek to perpetuate the very calamities that have so spectacularly failed us.

A new study shows that our modern economy is not only wrecking the climate, it's also poisoning us as individuals. 

There has been a fiftyfold increase in the production of chemicals since 1950 and this is projected to triple again by 2050.

Of the nine planetary boundaries we've now crossed five.  Chemical pollution now joins global heating, destruction of habitat, loss of biodiversity, and excessive production of both nitrogen and phosphorus pollution with ocean acidification now approaching the "never exceed" limit.


We know the dangers. We know the necessary solutions. What we lack is the vision and will to end this self-harm. We know that we must move to renewable energy and abandon the fossil fuel economy. We know that we must abandon our neoclassic economic model and globalization and transition to a low-waste circular economy. Far more important is that we know what befalls us if we don't.





Comments

  1. Menace the DennisJanuary 19, 2022 at 12:13 PM

    I notice there are reports that there are some people, probably with more than a fair share of spare cash, that have purchased no longer needed missile silos which they are retrofitting to be their long term refuges when the situation on Mother Earth warrants. Others are building rockets to take them elsewhere.
    In the meantime most of us plebs are blithely going about our lives hoping that somebody else will solve the climate change problem.
    DJF

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibJanuary 19, 2022 at 12:51 PM

      I read an article by a prof, a futurist at I believe NYU. His agent landed him a lucrative lunch gig at some swank club and so he busied himself preparing an address. When he arrived he discovered his audience comprised just three men, hedge fund managers and they weren't looking for an entertaining lecture.

      The three pelted this fellow with questions about social and economic collapse. They were the 'missile silo' type. They foresaw that, in collapse, money could become worthless. They worried about the threat from their own security, the armed muscle they looked to for protection and to defend the silo. What if their guards simply took what they had and either killed them or expelled them from their pricey refuge?

      As I remember it, the prof told them there was no way to avert the threat, they would ultimately be on their own.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

Image
  The Amazon rainforest is disappearing at what should be an alarming rate. 312 sq. mi. or 808 sq. kms. every day. Over the past 30 years humans have destroyed a patch of the Amazon equal in area to the states of Texas and New Mexico . The Amazon – historically a great carbon absorber, since trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen – now releases more carbon than it stores, which adds to, rather helps to reduce, our global climate crisis. Deforestation rates decreased slightly from 2004 to 2012. But since then, they’re back on the rise, especially in the past couple of years, since Jair Bolsonaro became president of Brazil. In 2018, as Bolsonaro campaigned as a patriotic man of the people, scientists predicted that once the Amazon lost more than 25% of its tree cover, it would become a drier ecosystem, all because deforestation changes weather patterns (due to how trees respire), which in turn reduces rainfall. Furthermore, as the forest becomes fragmented, areas surrounded...
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr...
Read more

Who Asks "Why?"

Every time there's a conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, all we hear is 'why?'  Why, as in, whose fault is this? It's easier to affix blame if you can truncate the event. Pick a convenient start date, something recent. In this case we'll make it either the Israeli eviction of Arabs from Jerusalem or the scuffle that took place outside the mosque in response. If those don't work, let's go for Hamas launching unguided rockets into Israel. That's even better because it tags Hamas with the blame. The nice thing about this approach is you can just keep using it. It goes on and on, just as it has for the past half-century since the '67 war. You can even date this whole mess to the beginning of the occupation of the Palestinian territories. The Israelis are said to have called these periodic wars, "mowing the lawn." The idea is that, every now and then, you have to take these Arabs to the woodshed. And then you keep your powder dry unt...
Read more