What a Novel Idea


"Infrastructure/resilience/climate change" 

Every cloud does have a silver lining.

The natural disaster that is today's southwestern British Columbia has got officials speaking the words they kept to themselves for decades.

“Recovering from this natural disaster will take time and a significant amount of collaboration and co-operation among all orders of government,” said Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair at a press conference in Ottawa on Thursday with other federal ministers.

“Highway and rail line damage is significant, and how we move forward in terms of a response will not only guide our emergency response efforts locally but can cascade nationally,” he said.

Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said the climate crisis is here, and the country will have to adapt to this reality.

“Climate change mitigation, and certainly adaptation, will have to be front and centre in the decisions that we make going forward at every level,” he said.

Wilkinson said the short-term focus is on protecting people in danger, helping those affected, and restoring transportation routes. But as the immediate crisis subsides, he said better decisions must be made.

What have these guys been doing for the last six years? Oh yeah, they were busy building a new pipeline to make the global climate crisis just that much worse.

“In the medium term, though, we will have to think about how we can build back smarter, with more resiliency in the infrastructure that we have,” he said.

A "risk assessment." Be still my beating heart.

Experts Canada’s National Observer spoke with said a priority should be making climate risk assessments standard practice across the country. That’s in part because infrastructure is designed to withstand weather impacts based on historic climate data –– a design standard that has little relevance in the emerging era of climate breakdown.

“Infrastructure continues to be built in that way, making it in many ways obsolete as soon as it gets built (because) it will be there for decades or even a century,” explains Canadian Institute for Climate Choices adaptation research director Ryan Ness.

Better late than never, I suppose. 

Canada lacks climate risk information, which is leading to poor decision-making. For example, available flood maps are 20 years old on average, with “virtually none” of them taking into account how climate change may impact the risk of flooding. At least 500,000 buildings are at risk of flooding and not identified by available government flood maps, the report estimates. Information on other climate risks, like wildfires, is also largely missing.

“In the absence of this information, few infrastructure owners or investors are able to assess and manage existing climate risks, let alone future risks associated with climate change.”

It was to be expected that the Conservatives, especially under Harper, would ignore these obvious, imminent perils, but the Trudeau Liberals have held sway for six damned years and what is their excuse?  They've been wantonly derelict in their duties but isn't that Justin Trudeau's way? He's still building that damned pipeline and forking out billions of dollars in subsidies and perks to the fossil fuel giants every year. That's rank hypocrisy.

Comments

  1. 'Don't build on flood-plains (or duh on lake bottoms)' is ancient wisdom/common sense that has long been ignored in favour of engineering projects. (Duff's Ditch being one of the rare, worthwhile projects.)

    And now those flood maps need to be updated for all the clear cutting & wetland destruction. such as the destroyed forest clear cuts on the steep slopes above Agassiz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A succession of provincial governments have been as derelict as their federal counterparts, NPoV. I recall reading a front page story in the Vancouver Sun, probably in the early 90s, about an Environment Canada study that found the population of the Lower Mainland had reached three times that area's ecological carrying capacity. What happened? Growth, more growth, endless growth, utterly heedless of the inevitable consequences.

      Victoria allowed the forestry giants to savage our mountain slopes, putting a loaded gun to the public's head. Growth, revenue, growth.

      And now we've reaped the whirlwind of that greed and neglect. Those we ought to have been listening to have warned us of our predicament just as they're warning us now that there'll be more events like this, only more destructive.

      Our leaders - Conservative, Liberal and, yes, NDP, have betrayed us.

      Delete
  2. In the Star today, Heather Schofield is echoing the same sentiments, Mound. It does make one wonder what it will take (if not your current disaster) to instill a sense of urgency over the climate crisis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've banged that resilience drum for years, Lorne, even as I watched readers turn away from that unwelcome message. The Fraser Valley problem isn't the first sign of our old, failing infrastructure. Look at the broken water mains sending rivers of water down Montreal streets in mid-winter or the overpasses in Toronto that shed concrete chunks on motorists below.

      For years I have argued for stress tests, a nation-wide inventory of our critical infrastructure. Junior, meanwhile, has chosen pipelines instead. He's quick enough to don his dad's buckskins or a neoprene suit to ride the surf of Tofino but it's all just more of his greenwashing.

      Delete
  3. Gas hoarding was rampant last Wednesday in Victoria. Most, if not all, gas stations were empty and closed by the end of the day.

    Apparently, people did not see the irony in hoarding the product that caused the problem in the first place.

    Of course, conserving gas didn't really occur to most people. I didn't see any significant reduction in the number of cars on the road.

    I can't recall hearing much on the news about the cause of the flooding....climate change. I wonder why that is....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought about topping up two nights ago, Gordie. I didn't. Last year I logged a blistering mileage of 2,025 kms. I think I'll get by - if only I can find a bag of sugar.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

The Gun We Point at Our Own Heads

Who Asks "Why?"