Jagmeet, Erin, Justin - Whose Side Are They Really On? Not Yours.

 

For Linda McQuaig, what the leaders say isn't nearly as important as what they won't say. From Canadian Dimension.


For sure, there’s talk about climate change—how low our emissions must go, how the parties’ climate plans compare, etc. But rarely does such talk zero in on the corporate crowd that keeps real climate action off the agenda and even manages to push a “climate warrior” government to purchase an oil pipeline, enabling ever higher emissions.

This failure to shine a spotlight on the real force blocking climate progress leads to a sense of hopelessness. It feels like we’re up against human stupidity when we’re really up against a highly organized group of cunning and ruthless corporate barons with the biggest war-chest of all time and legions of political and business lackies working tirelessly on their behalf.

This problem of overwhelming corporate power—and its effective veto over key areas of public policy—isn’t confined to the fossil fuel industry, but the stakes there are particularly high.

Curbing the power of corporations and those who own them—so we can have a future—should be our top priority. At the very least, it should be an election issue.

Almost a century ago, US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis observed: “We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”

That could be updated: “We can have a world that is livable for humans or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of the few; but we can’t have both.”

That’s the real choice on the ballot on September 20. The rest is just talkity-talk.

Comments

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_ownership_in_Canada#:~:text=Apart%20from%20a%20limited%20number,government%2Downed%20Canadian%20Broadcasting%20Corporation.

    https://clutchpr.com/canadian-media-landscape/

    https://wearesocial.com/ca/2021/02/09/digital-2021-the-evolution-of-the-digital-landscape-in-canada/

    And most importantly..
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc31Vi1h4rk

    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, TB, Carlin was right then and his words are still on point.

      Delete
  2. “We can have a world that is livable for humans or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of the few; but we can’t have both.”

    true ....but is that you and me??

    chehttps://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-richest-people-in-the-world-20160121-story.htmlck here

    To be among the wealthiest half of the world last year, an adult needed to own only $3,210 in net assets (minus debts), according to the data. To be in the top 10 percent, a person needed to have only $68,800 in wealth. To be in the top percentile, the threshold climbed to $760,000, according to Credit Suisse. (2015)

    I'm betting that a retired lawyer living on Vancouver island property
    could liquidate and get 3/4 mil plus
    I'm also betting that if any political party wanted to reduce that to 69 -100 thousand
    thru taxes etc leaving you in the top 10% of the world
    you would scream bloody murder

    and that is why better more equal economics and climate change are not being addressed
    no one is willing to give up anything.
    screaming that we have too
    and not being willing to face the numbers and personal reductions needed to
    is just rich people talkity-talking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An interesting take on McQuade's arguments, Lungta. I'm too old to scream. Don't have the energy any more.

      Delete
  3. "That’s the real choice on the ballot on September 20. The rest is just talkity-talk."
    I assume that here you are focusing on the climate policies, and I share your dilemma:

    * Libs & CONs are out.
    * At this time, the federal Greens are an embarrassing, dead-end exit off the fptp freeway.
    * The NDP-in-power in AB/BC have been (sometimes-effective) green-washers who have frittered away their time in power chasing LNG, Tar sands, Old Growth and Site C.

    So, imho, there is NO GOOD CHOICE for the climate-aware voter in Canada in 2021.
    In the meantime there are a lot of other issues - especially electoral reform - where I can make a clear choice.

    Tangential to this topic:
    Have aliens kidnaped Marc Jaccard and replaced him with a clone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Climate-aware voter." Well done, NPoV. Your point is made. As for Jaccard, I've been wondering the same thing.

      Delete
  4. lungta:

    Juxtaposing (in your cheeky guess work on our host's wealth) a modestly successful, middle-class Canadian against the world's poorest is not really fair framing.
    Yes, global inequality/over-consumption may well be the end of us all. Being among the 'lucky haves' does not immediately equate to guilt.

    A progressive tax system, with appropriately high 'marginal rates' for the truly wealthy, and no off-shore tax-havens will raise huge amounts revenue, everywhere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

The Gun We Point at Our Own Heads

Who Asks "Why?"