War in the Anthropocene - A Silver Lining?
What if governments become so overwhelmed with the demands of disaster relief that they couldn't contemplate military adventures, not even a Cold War?
Author Michael Klare considers the West's current bete noire, China, and concludes that China won't be much of a threat contrary to the fearmongering coming out of America's defence establishment.
“China has invested heavily in new technologies, with a stated intent to complete the modernization of its forces by 2035 and to field a ‘world-class military’ by 2049,” Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin testified in June. The United States, he assured the Senate Armed Services Committee, continues to possess “the best joint fighting force on Earth.” But only by spending countless additional billions of dollars annually, he added, can this country hope to “outpace” China’s projected advances in the decades to come.As it happens, however, there’s a significant flaw in such reasoning. In fact, consider this a guarantee: by 2049, the Chinese military (or what’s left of it) will be so busy coping with a burning, flooding, churning world of climate change — threatening the country’s very survival — that it will possess scant capacity, no less the will, to launch a war with the United States or any of its allies.
It’s normal, of course, for American military officials to focus on the standard measures of military power when discussing the supposed Chinese threat, including rising military budgets, bigger navies, and the like. Such figures are then extrapolated years into the future to an imagined moment when, by such customary measures, Beijing might overtake Washington. None of these assessments, however, take into account the impact of climate change on China’s security. In reality, as global temperatures rise, that country will be ravaged by the severe effects of the never-ending climate emergency and forced to deploy every instrument of government, including the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), to defend the nation against ever more disastrous floods, famines, droughts, wildfires, sandstorms, and encroaching oceans.
China, by virtue of its vast size, will be hit by the gamut of climate change impacts - droughts in the agricultural north, flash floods and sea level rise in the industrial southern coastal regions, water and food insecurity, everything that results from severe weather events of increasing frequency, intensity and duration.
Flash flooding is becoming a global nightmare. Central Europe, especially Germany, has been hammered this summer. Parts of Tennessee reeled from 17 inches of rainfall on Saturday. It resulted in walls of water that created scenes like this:
The complex array of factors that contribute to a flood can complicate efforts to quantify climate change’s role. But research shows that warming makes events significantly more extreme.
Several years ago I wrote of a pastoralist in the African Sahel who, like his ancestors for centuries past, supported his family by herding cattle. In one year he lost half his herd to drought. The next year he lost the rest to flash floods. The rancher and his family had to leave their land for a life of poverty eking out as subsistence living in the slums of Dakar.
Klare writes that China's crop of new mega-cities have an Achilles Heel. They were engineered for a climate now long past.
China's aging dams.
The IPCC outlook for Asia is grim. Beijing will have its hands full dealing with its own bevy of crises.
Does this rule out war between China and the U.S.? No. It does, however, demonstrate that Beijing may have other priorities than cold or hot military clashes with America. Of greater concern may be the Himalayan headwaters, most of which originate in Chinese occupied/annexed Tibet. Pakistan, India and China depend on access to those headwaters but China may be tempted to divert those rivers to meet its own needs. Remember, all three countries have nuclear weapons arsenals.
So far, both China's and America's military leaders have been reluctant to allow climate change to reshape their mission.
Sandbagging river banks, fighting forest fires or evacuating entire communities are occupations that don't justify new generations of stealth bombers and hypersonic weaponry. Eventually, however, we will have to put our military into safeguarding our own territory and securing the folks at home. In our hyper-militarized world that wouldn't be such a bad thing.
The military will always find ways to justify its existence, and an old dog finds it hard to learn new tricks. While China will be battling a myriad of crises related to climate change, so will the majority of other countries. However, the military will always be a few steps behind in recognizing a changing reality, Mound, so I'm not sure that a 'new way of doing business' is on the horizon, at least not from the American perspective.
ReplyDeleteI think we may find our defence budgets need trimming to free up funds for more essential services. Imagine if we only funded defensive capabilities instead of stealth fighters designed specifically to break down some other country's defences.
ReplyDeleteThee average American will willingly live in a dilapidated trailer court eat pizza and pork and beans whilst flying the biggest stars and stripes he or she can afford as long as they see exhibitions of the US military largesse.
ReplyDeleteThe battle for supposed military superiority between the US and China has only just begun and hopefully it will sink the desires of the military in both camps.
As Gwynne Dyer noted; a conventional war would last only a few weeks as supplies of weapons' are used up .
Complicated weapons take months, some over a year, to produce.
We then have to watch out for those that promote the idea of limited nuclear strikes.
TB
"Limited nuclear strikes" go hand in hand with stealth technology, TB. The F-35 is not an air superiority fighter. It's not a ground support fighter working with troops in the field. It is what US generals have called their "kick the front door in" weapon to help take down the target country's air defences opening the way for conventional and, perhaps, limited nuclear strikes with the new generation of small yield nukes.
DeleteIt's hard to see how any use of nuclear weapons ends without dragging in every nuclear weapons state, including Israel not to mention Pakistan, India and China.
Read Scott Ritters https://www.amazon.ca/Scorpion-King-Americas-Suicidal-Embrace-ebook/dp/B0892V5F5N
ReplyDeleteScary but true.
TB