"Failed" - It Sounds Better than "Defeated"

Former Afghan warlord turned president turned pundit in exile, Hamid Karzai, complains that the US and her allies "failed" Afghanistan and are leaving the country "in total disgrace."  At least he didn't say that the ISAF forces were "defeated." Failure can be spread around. Defeat is something the military wears - Algeria, Viet Nam, that sort of thing.

We were defeated. As in Viet Nam, we won all the battles but lost the war. The West went into Afghanistan with clear objectives - to send the Taliban packing for good, to destroy al Qaeda, and to restore civil society to the country, democracy, civil and human rights - that sort of thing.  The Taliban rallied, just enough to deny us our objectives. In other words, we lost. We were defeated.

20 years. The last American  army boot is supposed to leave Afghan soil on the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that sparked this madness.

20 years is a pretty long campaign, certainly by modern standards. Despite what some generals say, if you can't win in 20 years, you just can't win. There's a phrase that captures this David v. Goliath struggle. "We have all the watches but they have all the time." For us to win, we must use all our sophisticated firepower and military prowess to destroy them as an effective entity. For them to win, they merely have to survive as an entity, denying us combat whenever possible but keeping our forces in the field while the years roll on and the folks at home grow weary or bored.

"We will be better off without their military presence," he said. "I think we should defend our own country and look after our own lives. ... Their presence (has given us) what we have now. ... We don't want to continue with this misery and indignity that we are facing. It is better for Afghanistan that they leave."

Karzai's rule followed the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001 by a U.S.-led coalition that launched its invasion to hunt down and destroy the al-Qaida network and its leader, Osama bin Laden, blamed for the 9/11 attacks on America.

You tell 'em Hamid. Tell them about an Afghanistan that was never freed of the clutches of warlords, either Taliban or Northern Alliance.   Tell them about a country that went from oppressive and cruel to deeply corrupt from head to toe.  Tell them about a country that, in 20 years, has failed to raise an army capable of defending their nation against the Taliban.

Shortly after Western forces stormed into Afghanistan, a Senate foreign relations committee staffer testified that there had never been a country such as this that had achieved democracy without first abandoning the dual scourge of tribalism and warlordism. His warning was not heeded. 

The sad part, for Canada at least, is that there's no appetite for an honest discussion of our years in Afghanistan, what we did right and what we did wrong, how we were drawn into this fiasco and how we chose to expand our war for no good end.




Comments

  1. Bill MalcolmJune 26, 2021 at 12:31 PM

    I'd recommend reading some Afghan history. It hasn't been tribes only and for ever. There was some semblance of self-generated national secular government in the 1960s and a King before that. It was the move to educate girls by the Communist government in the late 1970s that got the provincial leaders all upset, and led the USSR to invade. Here's a quick summary since the 1960s:

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/06/usas-sordid-role-in-afghanistan/

    Pakistan kept the country down after the Russians left in 1989, with a little help from the usual suspects. Never hear much about that. Anyway, this summary will get a person a bit more informed than starting midway through the story at the start of our invasion and pontificating on the US and its allies performance based on the time since then alone. Being more informed just shows how even incredibly badly the West has handled the place since. Is there anywhere since WW2 where US invasion has ever improved the situation for the average citizen of the targeted country? Hmm. Let me tickle the old brain memory cells. Er, Nope. It's yer rules-based international order working in real time. International law? What's that when it's at home?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disaffected LibJune 26, 2021 at 9:00 PM

      Bill, I'm very familiar with the history of Afghanistan over the past two centuries. BTW, it wasn't under the Communists but the earlier monarchy that facilitated modernity in Afghan society.

      If you wish to more fully inform yourself, please check my previous blog. It's all there.

      Delete
  2. rumleyfipsJune 26, 2021 at 12:51 PM

    Canadians in Afganistan! Vainglorious is the word that comes to mind. A bunch of incompetent generals and weak politicians trying to impress an American establishment even more useless.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Up in Smoke. 300 Sq. Mi. of Amazon Rainforest Lost Every Day.

Image
  The Amazon rainforest is disappearing at what should be an alarming rate. 312 sq. mi. or 808 sq. kms. every day. Over the past 30 years humans have destroyed a patch of the Amazon equal in area to the states of Texas and New Mexico . The Amazon – historically a great carbon absorber, since trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen – now releases more carbon than it stores, which adds to, rather helps to reduce, our global climate crisis. Deforestation rates decreased slightly from 2004 to 2012. But since then, they’re back on the rise, especially in the past couple of years, since Jair Bolsonaro became president of Brazil. In 2018, as Bolsonaro campaigned as a patriotic man of the people, scientists predicted that once the Amazon lost more than 25% of its tree cover, it would become a drier ecosystem, all because deforestation changes weather patterns (due to how trees respire), which in turn reduces rainfall. Furthermore, as the forest becomes fragmented, areas surrounded...
Read more

The Cognoscenti Syndrome

  There is a group of people I think of as the Cognoscenti, people who are well educated, very informed and of rapidly diminishing relevance. Their ranks include writers such as Chris Hedges and Glen Greenwald. These are people who have honed an almost Puritanical value system, readily finding fault in any direction. They are scathing in their attacks on Republicans and Democrats alike to the point where they become nihilists. They don't endorse. They prescribe. This is where they fail. They're unable to advocate for anything that might resonate with the public whose interests they argue are being trammeled. Donald Trump was bad but Joe Biden is scarcely better. This is where their elitism comes in.  74 million may have voted for Trump but, hey, they didn't know any better. The mob that stormed the Capitol. They were just victims of the system venting their frustrations. All the racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, white nationalism - inevitable side effects of their oppr...
Read more

Who Asks "Why?"

Every time there's a conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, all we hear is 'why?'  Why, as in, whose fault is this? It's easier to affix blame if you can truncate the event. Pick a convenient start date, something recent. In this case we'll make it either the Israeli eviction of Arabs from Jerusalem or the scuffle that took place outside the mosque in response. If those don't work, let's go for Hamas launching unguided rockets into Israel. That's even better because it tags Hamas with the blame. The nice thing about this approach is you can just keep using it. It goes on and on, just as it has for the past half-century since the '67 war. You can even date this whole mess to the beginning of the occupation of the Palestinian territories. The Israelis are said to have called these periodic wars, "mowing the lawn." The idea is that, every now and then, you have to take these Arabs to the woodshed. And then you keep your powder dry unt...
Read more